RQ4: exactly what are users’ hookup experiences on Tinder?

RQ4: exactly what are users’ hookup experiences on Tinder?



Participants’ (N = 395) age ranged from 18 to 34 (M = 26.41, SD = 4.17)—EAs and Millennials, 18–34 years (see EA: Arnett, 2015; Millennials: Junco & Mastrodicasa, 2007). EAs and Millennials had been combined since: (1) dating apps are utilized most regularly by 25–34-year-olds, comprising EA and Millennials (Smith & Duggan, 2013), (2) they’ve overlapping social research, and (3) those 30—34-year-olds additionally included numerous individuals whom initiated Tinder usage as EAs. Participants’ (n = 314) indicated they first utilized Tinder roughly 3 days to 5 years back, with normal first activation at 512.93 times (SD = 321.48, Mdn = 365). In the period of very very first Tinder activation, individuals had been under 18 (11.2%), 4 EA (70.7%), and over 30 (18.1%). About half (50.4%) of individuals deleted their application multiple times ranging from 1 to seven (M = 1.71, SD = 1.06). Therefore, determining past and usage that is current hard, since participants’ use and relationship status diverse. This research needed individuals to own utilized Tinder for 30 days and also a minumum of one match; individuals could have formerly used the application (and their present relationship status may maybe perhaps perhaps maybe not mirror their relationship status while on Tinder).

Participants’ ethnicities included 70.6% Caucasian, 8.9% Ebony or African United states, 7.8% Asian or Pacific Islander, 6.8% Latino/a or Hispanic, 5.6% numerous ethnicities, and 0.3% indigenous United states. Individuals had been split across community kinds: 47.8% residential district, 37.7% metropolitan, 14.4% rural, and 0.3% unidentified. Education varied the following: 45.6% baccalaureate, 22.3% associates, 21.3% senior school diploma/GED equivalent, 8.9% masters, 1.3% doctoral, 0.3% some collegiate, and 0.3% technical level.

Participants’ sexual orientations included 83.9percent blended intercourse, 12.5% bisexual, 2.6% exact exact exact exact same intercourse, and 1% other (for example., queer, asexual, pansexual, demisexual, or unidentified). Individuals identified a certain intimate orientation as enthusiastic about 47.6per cent only ladies, 36.9% just males, and 15.5% people. Individuals characterized their present relationship status (may/may maybe maybe not reflect their status when working with Tinder) the following: 26.9% committed relationship (one individual), 25.1% maybe maybe maybe not in a relationship, 19.8% casually dating (one individual), 15.7% casually dating (numerous people), 5.1% hitched, 2% involved, 1.5percent never ever experienced an intimate relationship, 1.3% divided, 0.3% divorced, 1% domestic partnership, 0.8% committed relationship (numerous individuals), and 0.5% didn’t response.

Individuals had been recruited from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (Mturk), Amazon’s on the web crowdsourcing platform which allows employees to perform human tasks that are intelligentHITs).

Mturk provides comparable examples with other recruitment techniques providing affordability with use of a big, diverse pool (Mason & Suri, 2012). Inclusion requirements were individuals must be 18 years or older, be literate in English, and hold U.S. Residency. All orientations that are sexual welcomed. When they selected the HIT, individuals had been supplied a Qualtrics url to finish a survey that is online March 2016. Upon clicking the web link, individuals had been expected to read a permission kind, finish a survey (M = 29 min and 12 s), then had been directed to validation that is complete with regards to their (US$1.00) settlement.


The study included individual/relational demographics ( ag e.g., age, training, ethnicity, intimate orientation, and geological location) and mobile dating perceptions. Individuals had been expected questions regarding their Tinder use (account setup, choices, selection techniques, and post-match interaction), 5 and Tinder hookup perceptions had been gathered.

Perceptions, selection, and removal. Initially, six concerns (two open-ended and four closed-ended) calculated basic online dating impressions.

Open-ended questions read: “What is the general impression of online relationship? ” and “What is your general impression of those you meet online? ” Two close-ended questions, on A likert-type scale (1 = strongly concur; 5 = highly disagree), calculated internet dating perceptions. Participants compared their online and mobile to old-fashioned relationship on a 3-point scale (e.g., better, worse, exact exact exact same). Also, a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = small to none; 5 = acutely) gauged perceptions of online/mobile dating popularity. Individuals were then expected: “Explain your motivations for selecting the Tinder mobile application” and “Explain your motivations for making use of the Tinder mobile application. ” App task included questions regarding account initiation, regularity of use, and so forth. Individuals had been additionally expected if they tried other apps whether they utilized online or mobile dating apps, how many, and. Along with asking about their activation, We additionally evaluated whether or not they removed their Tinder account, their rationale for performing this, and exactly how often times.

Pre-interaction preferences. These concerns paralleled items that Tinder profile users must figure out upon activating their profile.

First, participants discussed their profile preferences—age range (cheapest and greatest), sex choice (guys, females, or both), proximity range (1–100 miles), and if they selected to determine their status when it comes to their work, passions, and typical connections and if they had been premium users. 2nd, participants had been expected to offer explanations of these bios—whether a bio was had by them, why/why maybe maybe not, and bio term count. Finally, individuals had been inquired about their pictures (e.g., amount of pictures, way to obtain pictures, and whom aside from the individual was at the pictures). how to use lesbiedates